Discussion in 'OT Driven' started by Mitchj, Sep 14, 2009.
Per Jalopnik the AMG is actually cheaper than the CTS-V, so Lutz is an idiot.
isnt the ctsv in the e63 class anyway?
they are the same price really.
Id rather the AMG too
Rather have the AMG..
isnt the c63 0-60 4.3?, cts-v is 3.9....
CTS-V > C63
Those new GM commericals are so retarded.. When it comes to our cars against the competition we are just BETTER..
C63 all the way to the bank.
how much is the amg?
I think the CTS-V is the faster car, but not with a 77 year old man behind the wheel.
more than you can afford pal, mercedes-benz.
I'll take the one with the manual transmission please.
according to a comment on there
no idea how accurate it is
2010 CTS-V MSRP: $58,575
2010 C63 AMG MSRP: $57,350
gm is like the retarded kid in gym class. lots of heart, but barely lucid
2010 C63 AMG
6.3 liter v8
556 hp @ 6,100 rpm
551 lb-ft of torque @ 3,800 rpm
CTS-V's look like ass.
don't forget that mercedes are only autos too
thats why they went bankrupt, cause they thought they were on top of everyone else.