Discussion in 'Vaginarium' started by Falconer, Aug 20, 2009.
No condom or chemical bc.
They are both at fault.
Let me intercept this one right here and say the purpose of this thread is NOT to have a "whose responsibility is birth control" discussion.
I feel like you kind of left out a few important details there Falc.
Of the thread? I was playing devil's advocate with a friend and it blew up into a huge discussion and I pissed off a few women (as I usually do one of whom was the same woman I pissed off years ago when she said she would date anyone, or "I'll give anyone a chance" and I told her she should have some standards )
Yea then I am confused at what you are really trying to get at if we aren't discussing bc.
We are discussing the forces at work behind the woman's decision to let a man fuck her and cum inside her without any form of bc.
Was she overwhelmed by attraction (a la "Sperm Wars" theory) such that she consciously (or unconsciously) at the moment didn't care if she got pregnant or not, or was she just being stupid and not thinking?
this does not fall in line with
idk Falc, has she ovulated?
first one's a joke from the chat thread
then I asked if the woman has ovulated in your scenario
she either A) was being stupid or B) wanted to get pregnant.
werd. good question.
Was alcohol involved? Or a drug of some kind (willingly took, not a date-rape scenario)? This can have a severe impact on our ability to think clearly (our = EVERYONE, not just women).
If the answer is no, then one of two things happened: Either hormones where making one not think rationally (it's happened) and the thought of "oh shit, I better make sure he uses a condom" on her part never entered her mind. Obviously it's the same for the guy...so overwhelmed at the idea of finally getting his dick wet, he didn't think to ask about whether she was on BC or not, didn't think of the consequences of not using a condom (STDS, anyone?). Or, she just didn't care if she got pregnant or not. Probably was hoping for it.
Needless to say, they ar BOTH at fault.
when it does happen i think its more of a momentary lack of judgement.
i dont think any woman (not including one who is looking to get pregnant) can find a guy so hot that she says "fuck it. he's so hot i dont care if he knocks me up even if i dont want to".
Why does it fall on the woman?
Guys have control in these situations too. It's called - THEY CAN PUT A FUCKING CONDOM ON THEMSELVES IF THEY DON'T WANT BABY-MOMMA-DRAMA
that was not the question. he even specified that it's not about responsibility.
simply why a woman may do it.
Did you read his explanation of what he meant by the thread?
What was behind the WOMAN's decision for letting the guy cum inside her. Not whose fault it is, or shared responsibility etc....
In the heat of the moment sometimes you don't think about the repercussions until after the fact.
Who would ever think about things that are much more important to self-health.. Like a condom
I realize that...but then flip it this way:
A guy fucks a woman. She gets pregnant.
What was the GUYS logic behind fucking someone without ensuring there was some sort of protection? Is it simply the whole "YEAH! It feels much better without a condom, who cares about the repricusions!"
It's a two way street.
I'd like to rephrase my question
Did she think she had ovulated?
Obviously she had or was close to ovulating
Everyone learns at a young age that when a man cums inside a woman that she can possibly get pregnant. Stupidity is not an excuse unless you're mentally challenged.
The woman's the one left with the consequences. She makes the decision to let a guy inside of her without a condom. If the guy doesn't wear a condom, it's her responsibility to say "no" if she doesn't want to get pregnant
Yes and no. What if HE doesn't want a kid, but wasn't thinking about that when he was pumping away and cumming in her? Then she gets knocked up, decides to keep the kid and goes after him for Child Support. He then is also responsible for the "consequence"