Kirk Hinrich
New Member
I wants one. Fucking couldn't get the cash together to pick up that other one going on here for 500.
nope. Dude I am incapable of making a decision. Still have no lens. Have a battery now though, at least.Thought you bought one already?
thats what i got..I think to start I am just gonna go 50 1.8 and the 18-200.
I think to start I am just gonna go 50 1.8 and the 18-200.
just get the 50 for now and then decide what to get later... at least you'll have a lens.![]()
members only, ngain for another girth kirk and xenon thread![]()
explain nga
picture > 100 words
![]()
18-200 pic is at f/6.3 and 28-70 pic is at f/4 both coming from about the same distance and focal length.
both at 100%
Completely different lighting, you can't compare the two.
For a fair comparison you'd have to have all variables fixed, except for the lens.
With that said, the 18-200 is obviously softer than the 28-70, generally speaking.
I think to start I am just gonna go 50 1.8 and the 18-200.
I really enjoy the 18-200VR it's a very good lens overall.
The zoom is awesome and with VR the lens really shines.
![]()
I dont think it is, I think its a zoomed in 2nd picture to show how a zoom works![]()
We understand that, but if you downsize a picture in post it will appear sharper than it really is.
We understand that, but if you downsize a picture in post it will appear sharper than it really is.
It's pretty sharp to me @ 200
there's no way its that sharp at 200.