Discussion in 'Entertainment' started by HisXLNC, Nov 28, 2003.
While it is not the best of the Batman movies, its still a good movie.
No, it's not.
no adam west no care
batman > batman returns > dogshit > all other batman movies
It had good actors, but I hated the way they chose to change the look of it to a fruity batman movie.
Batman > Batman Returns> Batman and Robin > Batman Forever
Batman Returns was better than Batman.
Clooney is horrible - especially as batman
are you watching HBO? Real Sex is on next
west > keaton > kilmer > dogshit > nissan > clooney
I just liked it because the Riddler's my favorite Batman villain.
BTW, Frank Gorshin > Jim Carrey
Says the man with the big white stripe on his "sport truck."
west-era villains > keaton/kilmer/clooney-era villains
Now I know you're full of shit.
That whole show was corny as hell and the villains were the corniest part. It was one big cornball. While its good, no way in hell its not corny.
they were both good
Corny > half-assed serious
All of the movies after the first new batman are just as corny as the original show, but without the humor.
batman and robin = est shit ever
Batman had the greatest DC villain in it.
Yeah, it was good, but that faggot Robin fucked it up.
I liked it.
That was the beauty of it. Not only did they have these corny villains, but they had some of the most respected actors of that era playing them (Caesar Romero, Burgess Merideth).
The villain on the pilot episode was the Riddler, who had only been used twice in the comics; and that was about 25-30 years prior to the TV show. It was Frank Gorshin's hilarious portrayal of the Riddler that made the character popular again. He was also the only actor to be nominated for an emmy for the show.
Dark and serious > old corny
Batman > *
now shut up all of you!!
You can't be serious.....