Discussion in 'Lifestyle' started by SenenCito, Mar 14, 2007.
1st one: Did you have a couple lights in her hands:
in both actually
even though it adds to the overall look and feel of her costume, the rough pores on her face are very harsh and unattractive. If you're going for a "sexy vampire" look, then do some work to reduce the contrast on her chin, cheeks, nose and forehead
quite the contrary, I am not going for a sexy vampire look, the rough pores were done on purpose, perhaps if you see the original you will get a better idea..
even before I read smog's post I thought "are those freckles? freckles on a vampire??!!!"
These are really awesome portraits, I think. They're both well lit and interestingly lit, which I find sweet, because most portraits I see are only the first, and are frankly boring as shit. Walmart portrait studio style.
hmm I see..guess ill have to change a bit, im asuming you mean the second one?
Diggin the first one.
nice editing job...the original looks so "normal" compared to your edited version!
Photos deserve more attention
put a macro of a gay flower in her mouth and a douchey landscape behind her and it'll be 3 pages in no time
She looks like a whore.
I like whores.
OH HAY! lo
Nice pics, I like the pp work.
Nice, I would very much like to be a vampire