California Peeps - Did you vote for or against Prop 22?

[Ron]

I voted no but my wife voted yes

 

[Souppishdawg]

Voted no

 

[Ron]

Prop 22 is about classifying app drivers as independent contractors versus employees

Which is a direct response to AB5 which would basically put Lyft, Uber, etc. out of business in the state

For nonCalifornians

 

[beddachedda]

Voted yes

 

[VipZ28]

End the gig economy before it starts please.

 

[ChemicalWhore]

Yes, because my last Uber driver asked me to

 

[Ron]

End the gig economy before it starts please.

We’re deep in the gig economy

 

[phat🐄]

LOL FUCK NO

 

[Ron]

LOL FUCK NO

You mean like fuck people who voted no

Or were you emphatically saying you voted no?

 

[phat🐄]

You mean like fuck people who voted no

Or were you emphatically saying you voted no?

oh fuck the wording of tis initiative is so fucked

yes means no and no means yes

 

[Hops]

Everyone I know voted/is voting yes. Not until this thread have I heard of anyone voting no.

 

[d0rkus]

Voted no.




Only because I got like 20 spam text to vote yes on it

 

[NoOneYouKnow]

Ride sharing companies who spent $200+ million on this initiative: "we can't possibly afford to pay our drivers more".

 

[NoOneYouKnow]

There's also zero chance this actually settles the issue. It's going to be tied up in court for years either way.

 

[Scold]

Ride sharing companies who spent $200+ million on this initiative: "we can't possibly afford to pay our drivers more".

How much do you think it would cost them to have to provide benefits, car maintenance costs, car insurance, etc?

100% voted yes on 22. The reduction in drunk driving alone is worth keeping Uber and Lyft around.

 

[Ron]

There's also zero chance this actually settles the issue. It's going to be tied up in court for years either way.

How? AB5 is already a precedent for court rulings

I think they, i.e. Lyft/Uber, already tried to appeal and somewhat failed pending the outcome of this prop

 

[FlyNReeLow]

How much do you think it would cost them to have to provide benefits, car maintenance costs, car insurance, etc?

100% voted yes on 22. The reduction in drunk driving alone is worth keeping Uber and Lyft around.

thats the exact same reason i voted yes on this as well...

 

[skeletor25rs]

Congrats on letting your wife cancel out your vote.

 

[Ron]

How much do you think it would cost them to have to provide benefits, car maintenance costs, car insurance, etc?

100% voted yes on 22. The reduction in drunk driving alone is worth keeping Uber and Lyft around.

Has anyone studied that since 2017? I thought the results were mixed without definitively declaring one way or the other

 

[Ron]

Congrats on letting your wife cancel out your vote.

I filled out her ballot too

 

[NoOneYouKnow]

How? AB5 is already a precedent for court rulings

I think they, i.e. Lyft/Uber, already tried to appeal and somewhat failed pending the outcome of this prop

Loading…

www.washingtonpost.com

 

[Dissent]

voted yes. proposition 22 can sound a bit confusing though.

 

[Ron]

Loading…

www.washingtonpost.com

That doesn’t seem like it would impact implementation of prop 22/AB5

 

[the_antsy_honda]

yes

 

[RoblesGT]

voted no