Discussion in 'Lifestyle' started by Girth, Oct 13, 2008.
Have a ton more... just some of the ones I liked so far.
Not to shabby it got better as I scrolled
I like 8 and 21.
something about the colors is bothering me.
possibly wb issues
those are by no means the pictures the bride and groom are getting. What they get is up to my buddy... these are the ones I edited myself for my own pleasure.
and inside the tent, lighting was horrible. The only thing w/ lights on it was the band.
some are kinda grainy
typical texas wedding
In bastrop too.
agree it got better as i went along. 21 was the only one that really stuck out to me tho
21 isn't entirely terrible.
are you trying to say you like it, stormy? You know, its ok if you said it... just say it.
dark, but I dig
this is no comment on your photography, but at a glance the sausage in 17 looks like a turd.
maybe it's just me.
You got some crazy white balance issues going on. Compare the boots in 7 to 14. The skin tones are completely different in 11 and 12. Different white balance in 19 and 20. And 22-25 have a green hue; the skin tones in 24 look especially unnatural.
But they definitely got better as I scrolled.
I am not gonna lie - when I see any wedding photos, I end up unfairly judge them against the wedding shots that (.)(.) does. And none ever seem to compare.
now if the bride had a hole in her dress for her pregnant belly to stick out of, then that would be impressive
(*)(*) is in a league of his own, and I'm no (*)(*)!!! But that all comes from experience. He's been doing it a lot longer than me and has more weddings under his belt. Practice doesn't make perfect, but it sure does get you better... all in due time though, in due time!!!
back up for some. or un-zoom. goddamn
I was the second shooter for a friend, doing mostly candids. That's the reason for the non-zooms. I didn't take the 70-200 VR off my D300 the whole night, and my D80 and 10-20 was in our barn "group photo booth".
8,9, and 21 are my favorites. Some good shots in there.