ART Farmtastic wedding pictures...

Girth

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
OT Supporter
Jun 28, 2002
71,125
Houston
1
2935979857_4b594f2ab9_o.jpg


2
2936835316_cb6e901732_o.jpg


3
2936835518_938a22028c_o.jpg


4
2936835480_3752144371_o.jpg


5
2936835424_544eb71731_o.jpg


6
2936835368_2cf3a42396_o.jpg


7
2936860410_6f61cdfaec_o.jpg


8
2936835562_f7e899db79_o.jpg


9
2935980355_081c036c62_o.jpg


10
2935980247_0c0c820915_o.jpg


11
2935980307_240c51d535_o.jpg


12
2936835840_ea2277497d_o.jpg


13
2935980529_eef8ffbc8c_o.jpg


14
2936835922_b2b3b2e0a4_o.jpg


15
2936836426_c02c042f5e_o.jpg


16
2935980891_959294b230_o.jpg


17
2936836348_3fb082e7d5_o.jpg


18
2935980995_5efc8ef521_o.jpg


19
2936835974_c0c002aa32_o.jpg


20
2936836464_9dea76d476_o.jpg


21
2935981179_829af1262c_o.jpg


22
2935981225_723bc43179_o.jpg


23
2936836676_1aae59f164_o.jpg


24
2935981395_80b16b8709_o.jpg


25
2936836622_e4622dfb57_o.jpg
 
TS
TS
Girth

Girth

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
OT Supporter
Jun 28, 2002
71,125
Houston
something about the colors is bothering me.
possibly wb issues

those are by no means the pictures the bride and groom are getting. What they get is up to my buddy... these are the ones I edited myself for my own pleasure. :o

and inside the tent, lighting was horrible. The only thing w/ lights on it was the band.
 

Dwight Schrute

New Member
Oct 11, 2003
8,542
You got some crazy white balance issues going on. Compare the boots in 7 to 14. The skin tones are completely different in 11 and 12. Different white balance in 19 and 20. And 22-25 have a green hue; the skin tones in 24 look especially unnatural.

But they definitely got better as I scrolled. :o
 

wizeguy4

Active Member
Apr 5, 2002
2,432
Allentown, PA
I am not gonna lie - when I see any wedding photos, I end up unfairly judge them against the wedding shots that (.)(.) does. And none ever seem to compare.

now if the bride had a hole in her dress for her pregnant belly to stick out of, then that would be impressive
 
TS
TS
Girth

Girth

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
OT Supporter
Jun 28, 2002
71,125
Houston
I am not gonna lie - when I see any wedding photos, I end up unfairly judge them against the wedding shots that (.)(.) does. And none ever seem to compare.

now if the bride had a hole in her dress for her pregnant belly to stick out of, then that would be impressive

:werd:

(*)(*) is in a league of his own, and I'm no (*)(*)!!! But that all comes from experience. He's been doing it a lot longer than me and has more weddings under his belt. Practice doesn't make perfect, but it sure does get you better... all in due time though, in due time!!! :)
 
TS
TS
Girth

Girth

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
OT Supporter
Jun 28, 2002
71,125
Houston
back up for some. or un-zoom. goddamn

I was the second shooter for a friend, doing mostly candids. That's the reason for the non-zooms. I didn't take the 70-200 VR off my D300 the whole night, and my D80 and 10-20 was in our barn "group photo booth".
 

Users who are viewing this thread

About Us

  • Please do not post anything that violates any Local, State, Federal or International Laws. Your privacy is protected. You have the right to be forgotten. Site funded by advertising, link monetization and member support.
OT v15.8.1 Copyright © 2000-2022 Offtopic.com
Served by fu.offtopic.com

Online statistics

Members online
478
Guests online
63
Total visitors
541

Forum statistics

Threads
369,432
Messages
16,883,417
Members
86,873
Latest member
vitalesan