Discussion in 'On Topic' started by Soybomb, Apr 27, 2009.
Whats your preference?
I voted yes only because all my Glocks are 3rd gen but I don't really care.
Nope, I can't dig 'em.
I don't like the grooves
I'm not very sophisticated. Either way is fine with me.
I'm fine with the grooves on my 29SF.
Depends on the frame size, but generally I don't like them
I went with a 2nd gen 19 cause I wasn't a big fan of the grooves. I like 'em fine on the 17, just wasn't a fan on my 19.
thats why i went with a 17 over a 19, just couldnt get comfortable with the 19. now i want an OD 19 though
I don't really think you're a jerk, but you left out the "no preference" option.
No to finger grooves.
I like to cram all of my strong hand fingers as high up on the gun as I can and that means some of my fingers are on top of the finger groove and throws my grip off some times. I want my grip/fingers to be simetrical so they are consistent. I hate how Glock adapted the finger grooves.
yeah, you will definitely need to remove the grooves if you undercut your trigger guard.
The gun will feel/shoot different with a undercut, my SVI did.
Hmmm sounds like I might go with a gen2 17 and then just modify future glocks to match if I pick up a 20 or 29 later.
Well how do you expect to attach a light, laser and bayonet without the front rail?
i voted for every option
What do you guys think of $420 out the door for a police trade 2nd gen? Doesn't seem stellar but it doesnt seem bad either.
Not terrible how many mags?