Discussion in 'On Topic' started by cellphonedude, Sep 7, 2005.
SA XD40 4"
i vote for sig
do you have an hk?
nope, but theyre slightly out of this price range. I'll probably get a USP compact some day..
unless you can convince me that its that much better than either of these 4
Sig hands down...
who the fuck voted for anything else
bump for day crew
how can you compare a Sig to a XD
I've always liked Sigs (in my limited experience) but I hear good things about the SA, even though I've never shot one.
CZs are nice guns. I have a friend locally that swears by them. Is this just going to be a range gun?
@ people voting for the CZ
I have a Springfield XD40 and my father has a sig 226. While not a 220, it should feel similar.
While the sig is nice and I like it, I prefer my xd40 due to the weight,feel,ergonomics of it.
It depends what you want out of the gun and its purpose. Take them all for a 'test drive' at the shop and see which one feels better.
i want an xd40.
but you should get a 1911 over any of those.
I picked sig only cuz it is the least sux0r of all those listed
yeah its just a range gun, it wont be for carry.
I voted for the cz myself, but like I said, the results of the poll decide my purchase...
If you just want a range gun, get a browning or lorcin, or hitech. something shitty and cheap
as much as I sackride SA, I voted for the Sig because the SA design is still somewhat new
You're an idiot. CZs is best handgun for the dollar you can get. Ive never heard of anything negative out of CZ owners about these guns, all positive.
And I dont know why you wouldnt have the money for an H&K but you would for a Sig. Around here, the Sigs go for about $750 and the H&Ks go for about $700.
I chose Sig on your poll because a 220 is my dream gun, however, I wouldnt hesitate to pick up a CZ anyday.