Discussion in 'On Topic' started by Soybomb, Apr 25, 2007.
I just couldn't read it all
It was painful, I admit.
eh, it's SF, wtf do you expect?
where does he hear about all this news? everyone who carries a gun is itching to shoot some one. i know i haven't heard anything like that i'd like to see his sources.
i'll probably email him later asking to describe what happened in washington dc and chicago after they banned hanguns
Wait, wait, wait. So he's saying mutually assured destruction didn't work? Who got nuked? I must have missed that portion on the 3 years I've studied history
Shall we take a poll of CC members of WMD
go for it
this is what im planning on sending him:
anything i should add or change?
i need a good way to close it out
i'll just say some shit like "hopefully thinking logically will help change your mind" or something
yeah the idea itself was weak, but the painful part was the level of the writing itself.
I read about a quarter of it before giving up. When is an anti going to write a non-inflamatory, rational article? I'm not sure I've ever seen one.
Its because the instant they gain the mental capacity to write a non-inflamatory rational argument, they realize that guns are not the problem.
lol @ you using logic to argue with emotion
i just felt like sending something. i highly doubt i'll get a reponse.
*looks at dazed42 sideways*
I could only make it through the first paragraph.
Wow, he is comparing gun ownership to slavery, hangings and murdering native americans
There are more guns than people in the US. Banning them would do nothing but take away our right to self defense, sport, hunting, and basic human right.
"i hope your mother gets raped, you faggot hippie douche"