Discussion in 'OT Driven' started by t1h, Jul 4, 2007.
i mean, no one has ever sat in an f-body and honestly said "man this thing's interior is nice!"
look at the majority of GMs interiors...and they were bang for the buck...not for luxury
I hate the C5, and F-body's interior with a passion, so boring and plastic
high interior quality is not the reason to buy one of those cars.
I <3 GM but most GM interiors do, or did until very recently, suck ass.
Most people who have to be inside one, which is the standard seating position when operating a vehicle.
T100s are fullsize trucks?
bang for buck
toyota corolla interior = bang for buck
I'm ok with an interior being a little shitty but 4th gens are incredibly bad for a car that might not be that old. Those cars can look so good outside and be so meh inside
the car being bang for the buck...I don't know too many people that even use that phrase to explain an interior
My old roommate sold his because he couldn't take the terrible build quality of the car in general, especially the cheap and rattly interior, anymore.
Those things are minuscule.
who the fuck cares about the interior
He came off a 91 240SX, then 97 240SX, and went to a 04 Blazer. Not exactly the pinnacles of luxury.
indeed, he proves this time and time again.
They were more like 2/3 or 3/4 size trucks at best.
Both my brothers have lt1 f body's and a couple friends have some. I couldn't own one anymore because of the rattles and ride quality
what can you really expect though, he's a japanese car enthusiast.
I find it boring in appearance. The 64 especially looks alot like the Tempest it's based off of.
Unless you're trying to nitpick the 'sedan' part.
shitty ass interior but for a performance car costing 20,000$< new you cant really compain can ya.
If you insist.
I just don't have a huge regard for old muscle cars, or pony cars. One-trick ponys don't do much for me.
I mean, I love Toyota trucks, but this idiot sackrides what is basically, by all admissions, Toyota's biggest failure