Discussion in 'Lifestyle' started by macbook bro, Dec 21, 2008.
i think i want to sell it and just get a P/S, i'm too lazy to really use a DSLR properly i feel
Its been reduced to $275, doesnt include wireless remote
XT is a glorified P&S anyway
damn, thats not so hot
$225 at the most. More if you sell it on CL to a retard.
That's true, except for the fact that it's an SLR, can use an assortment SLR lenses and flashes, and has fully manual adjustability.
This isn't a great picture but it was taken with an XT @ iso1600 at night. It's seriously not nearly as bad as you people make it out to be.
but most users leave a kit lens on it and think they're Ansel Adams.
Some people who own D700's or 5D MkII's think their Ansel Adams too
There is nothing wrong with the XT honestly. The kit lens is the worst thing about the camera. It's obviously not as good as more expensive cameras in many ways, but ultimately the image quality is fine and it's solid and fairly easy to use.
Then again I've never bought into the whole gear is god thing.
I'm not even up to ( * )( * )'s standard... much less ansel adams.
Skills > Gear
Tits > Most of A&P > Him > Dogshit > Slimeball
Guess which photo was taken with a D200, pocket wizards, and two SB800s.....and guess which was taken with a XTi, kit lens, PW's, 580ex and 430.
My XT served me well for a long time
Put a good lens in front of it and it does just fine for your average amateur.
Is it black? If so, I might be interested.
Prime example of someone who didnt read my post.
yeah its black
most of OTAP is better than ansel adams? DAMN.
just like the D700 is a glorified 5D amirite?
They are. Just like a POS saturn is better than the first car ever made.
bought an XT to get into using digital SLRs. its a great camera to learn on. not horribly expensive so even if doing the SLR thing ends up not being someone's bag theres not much guilt about the money you spent. and if it sells to someone you can get a bit of money back.