Discussion in 'Lifestyle' started by Bloke, Jul 18, 2008.
id like to see if there is a consensus on how much these should cost.
f2.8 or faster
I got my 24mm 2.8 for 185
I bought a 28(-70) f2.8 for $1000
im not finding any that cheap
I want wider
i see a 28mm aspherical f1.9 for $389
is this the same mount
i bet it is spectacular
Probably low/mid-200's for a Nikkor 28mm f/2.8D
I bought Nikon's 24-70mm for $1700 when it first came out. Worth every penny.
What makes that one worth $750 more than my 28-70?
From Bjørn Rørslett, a nature photographer and basically one of the most knowledgeable and well respected people in the Nikon community, if you haven't heard of him.
Don't forget the 14-24. This quote basically sums it up.
yeah well its hard to reach cost consensus when people throw in zooms, since they are usually more expensive
Oh, well you should have specified primes. Guess I could have assumed that though.
Canon or Nikon?
Canon 28 f/1.8 ftw.
I wasn't bashing you I was just curious.
For my purposes I still don't think its worth the extra 750.
Oh no, I didn't think you were bashing anything. Just wanted to answer your question.
how much $?
still cant get a deal like this
i wanted the SONY minolta mount version and people on ebay bid the shit out of it. do people really buy the sony bodys jacking up the prices for me?
i mean a brand new sony 28mm is Price: $249.99 the 20mm is more though.
i guess ill try another mount.
mounts i can use
Pentax 42 screw
fuck i missed adorama has a demo one for 150