Discussion in 'Lifestyle' started by turbodude, Sep 30, 2006.
Anyone hear any more news?
yeah, its still inferior
inferior compared to what?
yeah exactly. for a camera that no one has touched, how can you make such an assumption
I heard later this month or early November. I can't wait to try one out.
He's a photographer, its in their nature to be know-it-all snobs.
yea. so far all i have heard is tremendously good thing about the features, lens options, and versatility. but i guess we wait for when t comes out.
lens selection is horrid compared to canon and nikon. I can't see the point of buying a modern day camera and not having autofocus.
There are some sample shots out finally
Thanks for the link. I've been waiting to see some sample shots.
I'm not sure what you mean about not having autofocus. The K100D and K10D both have 11 point autofocus with 9 cross-type sensors.
I was referring to their "lens options"
It's lacking in terms of longer, auto-focus glass. I'm definitely waiting out to see how the high ISO performance is from this K10D, sounds damn close to a 5D but for a 1/3rd of the cost
damn the pumpkin pics, quite the detail in that picture capturing all the craters and crevices
ALL AUTOFOCUS. Tell me what don't they have covered?
i was gonna say what camera manufacturer these days wooldn;t offer a autofocus lens!
you know, I always hear about those lenses, but NEVER do I see them at bhp, keh, or ebay. It's funny that they are listed, but probably have about 10 produced. There is such a demand for them, the prices our outrageous. I see A* 300mm (manual) go for $1000+ on ebay all the time and that's the only thing in the way of "long" glass I've seen from Pentax.
Maybe that's because you can order directly from Pentax and buy anything they sell, but then there's also these:
How about you just stop posting. k? It's becoming painfully obvious that you don't know what you're talking about.
ok, continue to pay almost $5000 for a fucking 300mm lens. Pentax is a joke and I'm not saying this uneducated about them, I owned one of their SLR's about 3-4 months ago and glad I got rid of it. Until they get some R&D into some good lenses, it'll never be worth a damn, no matter how good the K10D is
speechless? yeah, I don't blame you. Let me also mention that the 100-300mm zooms are HORRIBLE quality, it's hard to beleive pentax even designed something so horrible
Are you the same Steve325 over at DPR who didn't know what the 1.7 in 1:1.7 meant?
have you even looked at their 2007 lens options, its well taken care of for a prosumer. k10d was not meant for the "pro" Its still can;t replace a 5d, or a 1d. But it was meant to compete with the walkaround dslr, at a great price and finally stir up Canon and Nikon monopoly.
I mean anti shake body, is a definate plus, makes any lens you put on there "IS" vs having to purchase an IS lens
Speechless. Ha, that's a laugh, no I just got bored pointing out how retarded your posts are.
Have you never heard the phrase 'it's better that people think you're stupid than to open your mouth and remove all doubt'? Just admit that you don't know shit about photography and you are only here to sackride Canon and Nikon so you can fit in.
no canon, no care
so... I think I might buy a k10d.
Wonder how it'll compare to the D80/Alpha/400d....
high ISO shots are out
not impressive by any means. This is the old fireware, so hopefully the final did something worth a damn. The DNG shots are a little bit better, but nothign to brag about
damn the high iso pics are junk...