Discussion in 'Entertainment' started by joy division, Dec 13, 2005.
looks to be OK
Pshaw!! Duh! OMG!
Yeah it does look good. I'm gonna see it on thursday.
more junk, crap movie, how many times does it have to be remade. how about an original idea and a plot, and acting instead of copying 2 older movies and use a ton of computer graphics to make fancy flashy pictures to draw people in like a fucking bug zapper does a bug
It holds no appeal to me.
King Kong is just a big ape to me. Now Godzilla, he is a real movie monster.
I saw it.
That was amazing.
I decided to see it cause I got in for free, and holy shit.
Should be a good movie.
Plus Watts is a dead ringer for a really close friend of mine. It's a kick seeing "her" (my friend) on the big screen. Well, she's younger than Watts.
can't wait to see it
i need to see this ASAP! DATE IDEA!
watts is pretty hot in the movie. didnt feel like 3 hours. good movie!
saw it lastnight and it was a great movie! the movie started out a little slow but once it got going it was nonstop! definitely worth watching!
I think you are thinking of something else.
how so, this is the 3rd time this movie has been done, is another remake with a bunch of CGI really what excites you? not big on originality on OT i guess, ok have your computer generated junk, give me a plot and some good acting, too bad there isn't much of that left
that's a witty reply,,,,,, i take it you disagree with my post huh, well enjoy yet another remake and a bunch of computer generated crap, i'll be watching an actual movie with some original thoughts and maybe even some decent acting
Fucking nothing is original man, get used to it.
with only 5 universal conflicts its pretty hard to come up with new ideas when we've been writing these stories forever. All people can do is make old idea's better. What was the last original movie you saw? Being john malkovich??
same genre and remaking a movie are sort of different don't ya think???
kong is the same movie it was only with computer graphics and worse acting, if you're into special effects i'm sure you'll enjoy it but i'd rather watch something that isn't a carbon copy of a 1930's movie and a carbon copy of the carbon copy from 1976,,,,it's been done 2 times, isn't that enough? but like i said, if you want effects then great, you're in luck cause that's all hollywood gives, it's pretty much low budget flicks or nothing for those who want some sort of original plot or decent acting etc. (and yes, i liked "being john malkovich" lol but you already knew that)
Kong 1933 or Kong 1976 or Kong 2005,,,,same exact thing just redone with a small difference here and there (and special effects have improved a bit lol)
The Hustler, Color of Money, Pool hall junkies. if you watch these movies it's very obvious that color of money and pool hall junkies rip off the hustler a TON but they aren't the same movie and Pool hall junkies rocks imo (color of money i'm not a fan) but if they just remade the hustler with new acting and more fancy camera angles,,,,,,i wouldn't go, that's all my point is, but that's me, like i said, if you're a fan of special effects then who cares, go to kong and enjoy, movies like that make 100 million bucks for a reason, they just don't get my $9
because this one has good acting, a solid plot, and is really enjoyable. It isn't just the old one with CGI.
It is impossible to have an original idea in today's day and time. Everything is a rehash of something else or items from multiple sources put together in a different way. Its not the content that makes something special. Its the presentation that can be new and appealing.
doesn't matter what the product is,,,just put a pretty bow on it huh?
i guess i just dis agree with yall, but seriously, it's just my opinion it doesn't need to take over the thread, i think this sort of film is junk, you don't, sweet, now go ahead and talk about the movie, why is everyone so concerned with me thinking this movie is junk? I'm really not that cool folks enjoy your kong
you haven't even seen the film you fucking tard. Your only reasoning behind it sucking is that its a remake and it has CGI
its an ass burner but the action is well worth it
i hate all fake computer graphic movies so it doesn't matter. but like i said that's my opinion and shouldn't control this thread, and why whould i be a "Tard" because i disagree with you, you're probably not as smart or cool as your mom has led you to believe
I thought first 15 minutes, and the last 2 hourse were good, but the other parts really sucked...PJ is going to have to learn that not every movie needs to be 3 hours long!!! I give it 3 1/2 out of 5