Discussion in 'Entertainment' started by smell my finger, Nov 7, 2003.
[the worst of the three]
little to no story development, half the movie was taken up by a poorly thought out Zion battle scene, seemed like there were about 45 minutes of footage missing to pull the story together cohesivly, ect ect ect
Did you even fucking watch the movie?
Read this thread, and be enlightened.
the second and third are to be considered one movie...they didnt try to make them have seperate stories, and it was too long to release as its own movie.
Best trilogy ever
My opinion is that the movie sucked. I think every scene made after the first film just took away from its original brilliance.
I don't think some people understand that the trilogy was planned. It seems like some people are under the impression that they made the first Matrix, and were sitting around one day and thought, "Hell guys, let's make two more!"
Either take all three or leave it.
I thought the one leader of the Zion army (forgot his name) put up one hell of a fight. That guy was pimp, even when he had his face slashed up.
too much screaming and shooting though...reminded me of the rambo scene in UHF
WHO ARE YOU!
I don't agree. I thought Reloaded was worse than Revolutions.
Both of them were pieces of crap compared to the original.