have a 01 Acura TL 3.2 .......they have a recall on the transmission, I took it in when I received the recall, but at the time the dealership told me the car was showing no symptoms of problems with said transmission. During this time my car was still under warranty........now fast forward to present day, car is showing signs of tranny problems; I take into dealer and they find the cause to be the tranny.....they agree to cover the parts but Im stuck with the labor costs which comes out to roughly $1,080.00.(since my car is out of warranty)......Now is this right for them to do......? charging me the cost of labor.....which would have been covered had they fixed my car when it was under warranty and when I took it to them the first time even though it showed no problems.....? shouldnt they be entirely responsible for their screw up to begin with regardless if it's under warranty of not.......?