Discussion in 'OT Driven' started by violator, Aug 6, 2005.
it's true, it's true
Boxster > both
I'd rather have a 350z.. torque is yummy...
Besides, the s2k is fugly.
oh god, instant 10 page thread
and the 350z>>>>>>>>>>>>>s2k
omg you're back for anothe whooping
Then you're looking in all the wrong rpms. If you've driven both you'll know what I'm talking about.
this fucking tool is back too
*ding* *ding* round 2 cabron. lets go!
what happens when you want to drive around town?
I should be more specific... Low end torque.
anyone who knows anything realizes that s2k >> 350z > rx8
I drove both, researched both (both 2005s) and ended up with...
So there's my opinion. The Z is faster, the S2000 is more fun to corner, but with better tires, the Z is definatly no twisties slouch, so the overall performance package won me over. Not to mention brake distribution (which I have loved now a few times), brake assist, and other various electric tech bits are quite nice.
"Low end" is relative.
Stay under 4K. Below that it's like the perfect daily driver.
Except the Z isn't faster.
I prefer the 350Z shape - the S2000 looks "narrow".