ART Sigma 10-20 on my 1dmkiiN

turbodude

Just a photographer
OT Supporter
Jun 17, 2002
10,037
Las Vegas
I finally got a chance to try my 10-20 on my 1d, and i must say its quite exquisite. without hood, it doesnt really vignette unles its at 10mm. it works really well at 11mm up until f9-f18 where you see slight vignette, but very very little, i would say 2% into the corners. Perfectly usable. I thought i was going to sell this lens and getteh 12-24 mainly sue to its FF compatibility, but this works great...

Here are the pics.

11mm at f4.5
3006749011_2ac136f8c1_o.jpg


11mm at 6.3
3007584406_6775300f25_o.jpg


11 at f9
3007584422_afbc5355aa_o.jpg



all of which can easily be eliminated in post.
11mm @ f9 PP'd out the Vignette, really easily too, LENS correction 100% and done. (still a little there but def not a problem)
3006760389_bf903dfbf5_o.jpg



ib.cleanyourdesk.jpg
 

Girth

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
OT Supporter
Jun 28, 2002
71,125
Houston
if you run out of tussin', add some more water... shake it up, MO' TUSSIN!!! :run:
 

wickedgun

New Member
Aug 27, 2008
400
kel-tec ftl! lozl j/k

nice pictures, i've been seriously debating on picking up a wide angle for my wife, and i've heard good things about the sigma 10-20. Is there any other lens out there that is comparable in picture quality but for less? or is the sigma pretty much the "cheapest" it gets?

*edit* sigma 10-22mm f/4-5.6 is what i was lookng at.
 
TS
TS
turbodude

turbodude

Just a photographer
OT Supporter
Jun 17, 2002
10,037
Las Vegas
the sigma 10-20 is the beezneez, ive had 2 of the sigma and 2 of the Canon USM. Both my Canons were soft on teh left side, both my siggys have been sharp as fuck.

and btw my PF9 is the shit, i carry it everyday with any kind of clothes. Pocket carry ftw!!!!

I also have a Taurus PT1911 (cheapest most dependable 1911 i have ever shot), Kimber Warrior, Steyr M9, DPMS AR15, and Savage Win .308 rifle

I love my guns, reason i live in Vegas vs California
 

wickedgun

New Member
Aug 27, 2008
400
we here in texas call kel-tecs throw down guns. throw em down for the badguy to use cause chances are it wont go off.lozl. lil shootin range humor.


is there much of a difference between the sigma 10-22 vs the canon model other then brand name and price?
 

xconverge

OT Supporter
Apr 11, 2008
6,335
San Francisco, CA
Its either the sigma 10-20 or the Canon 10-22. I would look up some reviews on them, everyone has their own opinions. Lens distortion and sharpness are also different most likely
 
TS
TS
turbodude

turbodude

Just a photographer
OT Supporter
Jun 17, 2002
10,037
Las Vegas
sigma 10-20 is better at handling distortion, canon is supposed to be sharper, havent noticed that at all having owned both.

both are prone to flare, i think its the nature of a UWA. Canon has a slight edge on contrast, and i do mean slight. not worth the 200 plus price difference. Also teh build is soooo much better on teh siggy. the canon feels like a plastic toy
 
TS
TS
turbodude

turbodude

Just a photographer
OT Supporter
Jun 17, 2002
10,037
Las Vegas
we here in texas call kel-tecs throw down guns. throw em down for the badguy to use cause chances are it wont go off.lozl. lil shootin range humor.


is there much of a difference between the sigma 10-22 vs the canon model other then brand name and price?

the pf9 has never had an FTE or FTF, it goes bang anytime and every time i want it to, I bet my life on it everyday :)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

About Us

  • Please do not post anything that violates any Local, State, Federal or International Laws. Your privacy is protected. You have the right to be forgotten. Site funded by advertising, link monetization and member support.
OT v15.8.1 Copyright © 2000-2022 Offtopic.com
Served by fu.offtopic.com

Online statistics

Members online
363
Guests online
46
Total visitors
409

Forum statistics

Threads
369,565
Messages
16,895,891
Members
86,875
Latest member
Theodor