The engine ran for 300 hours straight, simulating 150,000 real-world miles, then dragged 110,000 lbs. So, how's it look?
The dual-overhead cam powerplant was shipped to dynamometer cell 36B in the Ford Dearborn engine labs and run for 3,000 hours to replicate the equivalent of 150,000 customer miles,
so which is it?
probably the one where the engine is driving at 500 mph![]()
rkbergman said:The engine ran for 300 hours straight, simulating 150,000 real-world miles, then dragged 110,000 lbs. So, how's it look?
The dual-overhead cam powerplant was shipped to dynamometer cell 36B in the Ford Dearborn engine labs and run for 3,000 hours to replicate the equivalent of 150,000 customer miles,
so which is it?
Wirelessly posted via wap.offtopic.com (Crimsons BBCurve: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; rv:1.9.0.8) Gecko/2009032609 Firefox/3.0.8)
Obviously an error but common sense tells you 3000 hours
Super_Flea said:Wirelessly posted via wap.offtopic.com (Crimsons BBCurve: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; rv:1.9.0.8) Gecko/2009032609 Firefox/3.0.8)
Obviously an error but common sense tells you 3000 hours
True, but be careful not to assume everyone on here uses common sense
OK NOW PUT IT IN LITERALLY EVERY FORD VEHICLE
OK NOW PUT IT IN LITERALLY EVERY FORD VEHICLE
I'm sure it won't be long until we have a turbo Mustang.I would have no problem with this.
In for EcoBoost Mustang![]()
A leakdown test was performed to measure how well the engine’s 24 intake and exhaust valves and piston rings were still able to seal the cylinders. One cylinder was found to have a cautionary 13 percent air loss past the combustion chamber’s seals, while all other cylinders were acceptable with single digits of air leakage.
ecoboost is the next chevy 350 in terms of reliability
365hp Fusion.paying extra for a v6 fusion
paying extra for a TURBO v6 fusion![]()
Whoa there n!gga. Chevy 350 been proven in REAL WORLD where the ecoboost is proven in the lab, yea clearly the same.
I'm sure it won't be long until we have a turbo Mustang.