GonadWarrior
Well-Known Member
- May 11, 2001
- 142,326
Bro at :08 did you FF the clip?
Look at the distance between truck and Prius in front..
Bro at :08 did you FF the clip?
Look at the distance between truck and Prius in front..
GonadWarrior
Well-Known Member
- May 11, 2001
- 142,326
Opus X
Well-Known Member
- Jan 20, 2006
- 2,444
I’ll let some one crash into me like that every fucking day. I have no emotional investment in my cars and would love a new paint job for free.
Sooo hard
No it's the change from the save of the first clip to the beginning of the next from.the dash cam. It saves in 1 min increments and the accident happens right at the beginning of the clip. So in order for me to show the 5 seconds prior I just took the two clips merged them in iMovie and trimmed it. The chnage over between clips iMovie added.
GonadWarrior
Well-Known Member
- May 11, 2001
- 142,326
You see him merge onto the express lane
You note the slow Prius in his lane, and know he wants to be in your lane, so you stay next to him, even speeding up a little to avoid him turning into your lane
He puts on his signal, you don't hit the brakes or even try to avoid him moving into your lane
His fault, no doubt
But now your car is also busted :/
I'm always ultra defensive on the freeway bc of how idiots switch multiple lanes when merging. Rather not be involved in any accident than a "non fault accident".
I didn't even realize he was trying to pass the Prius until I watched the extended clip(hence why this is the first time I'm mentioning it). That is me noticing something in hindsight. Originally I didn't know why he decided to change lanes, now I know.
i'll do that if i'm in the left lane in the process of passing someone but there is a car in front of me and some jerkoff speeds up around me with the thought that he is going to squeeze in right in front of me
popnfresh
Cuddle Bitch
congrats now you have to deal with all the bullshit instead OF JUST FUCKING BRAKING, but hey you get to brag about it on the internet, only for us to call you retard
They have the video. They've watched the video. They found their insured 100% liable.you know what, from the looks of the video, you actually sped up into him as soon as you saw him breaching your lane so you could pit manuever him. Would be a shame if his insurance takes another look at the video you posted
///TRASH
🤙 Chill Vibes Only 🤙
Why the fuck didn’t you do anything to avoid the collision?
LanceVance
If you reply to me you are stupid.
whatever
OT Supporter
- Feb 18, 2004
- 214,065
whatever
OT Supporter
- Feb 18, 2004
- 214,065
BECAUSE THE OTHER GUY WAS 10000% in the wrong.
halflife78
WTF MATE??
The skip is the BlackVue system wheee it records in increments, what I asked about earlier in this thread.
Also, my 8 year old would of saw that coming.
Also, my 8 year old would of saw that coming.
LanceVance
If you reply to me you are stupid.
All you autists bitching about him failing to brake or take evasive action have failed to consider a couple of key factors.
1) dashcams have fisheye lenses that distort distance and angles. This is so that they can capture the maximum width of surroundings. So what may appear to you in the video to be a lot of room might actually be closer to half that much room if viewed with your own eyes IRL without the lens angle distortion. Everything looks easily avoidable in dashcam videos.
2) If you have much experience with driving, laws, and insurance OR if you read the stories of others that do, you will realize that it is not always to your advantage to try and take evasive action to avoid a wreck. Sometimes your attempt to avoid the wreck on one side can cause a wreck elsewhere, either because you lose control or you are forced to hit something else. Or sometimes another nearby vehicle then has to take evasive action and overreacts or underreacts and that vehicle causes a wreck, which may or may not involve you or be worse for you than the one you originally tried to avoid. And guess what? If someone runs you off the road and you wind up losing control or hitting something else as a result, the first vehicle gets to drive on with zero consequences or liability, and now YOU are liable for 100% of the incident, because no one contacted you. Even if you do try to avoid it and slow down just enough that they barely make contact, they can just drive away and again they are likely not to get caught and you will be left with all of the liability.
Go on youtube and watch some dashcam compilations...you will probably run across several that demonstrate this. A few months back there was a good one that showed this clearly. A minivan passes a cammer illegally and brake checks him hard while still merging in front of him, cammer brakes hard and tries to evade to the right to avoid, winds up losing control and fishtailing off the road, van continues on his merry way, cammer takes 100% of the loss because the van technically didn't touch him. If the cammer had held his place the van would have sideswiped him and either wrecked himself or at the very least probably have had to stop and take some or all responsibility for causing it. There is another where an SUV does something similar to a semi driver and eventually the SUV pits herself on the front of the semi and is found completely at fault due to the semi cammer's footage.
But yeah, sure, let's just let OT be OT and pile on with more of the "dur dur wHy DiDnT yOu BrAkE!!!" and "you could have avoided that so easily!" comments.
1) dashcams have fisheye lenses that distort distance and angles. This is so that they can capture the maximum width of surroundings. So what may appear to you in the video to be a lot of room might actually be closer to half that much room if viewed with your own eyes IRL without the lens angle distortion. Everything looks easily avoidable in dashcam videos.
2) If you have much experience with driving, laws, and insurance OR if you read the stories of others that do, you will realize that it is not always to your advantage to try and take evasive action to avoid a wreck. Sometimes your attempt to avoid the wreck on one side can cause a wreck elsewhere, either because you lose control or you are forced to hit something else. Or sometimes another nearby vehicle then has to take evasive action and overreacts or underreacts and that vehicle causes a wreck, which may or may not involve you or be worse for you than the one you originally tried to avoid. And guess what? If someone runs you off the road and you wind up losing control or hitting something else as a result, the first vehicle gets to drive on with zero consequences or liability, and now YOU are liable for 100% of the incident, because no one contacted you. Even if you do try to avoid it and slow down just enough that they barely make contact, they can just drive away and again they are likely not to get caught and you will be left with all of the liability.
Go on youtube and watch some dashcam compilations...you will probably run across several that demonstrate this. A few months back there was a good one that showed this clearly. A minivan passes a cammer illegally and brake checks him hard while still merging in front of him, cammer brakes hard and tries to evade to the right to avoid, winds up losing control and fishtailing off the road, van continues on his merry way, cammer takes 100% of the loss because the van technically didn't touch him. If the cammer had held his place the van would have sideswiped him and either wrecked himself or at the very least probably have had to stop and take some or all responsibility for causing it. There is another where an SUV does something similar to a semi driver and eventually the SUV pits herself on the front of the semi and is found completely at fault due to the semi cammer's footage.
But yeah, sure, let's just let OT be OT and pile on with more of the "dur dur wHy DiDnT yOu BrAkE!!!" and "you could have avoided that so easily!" comments.
crontab
Oracle doesn't have customers, they have hostages.
- Nov 14, 2000
- 25,071
bro...aint no one reading that
If you tried to drive like he does in LA, you’d be in a wreck every day