Wirelessly posted via wap.offtopic.com (htc touch : Opera/9.50 (J2ME/MIDP; Opera Mini/4.1.11355/408; U; en))
Is that one of the new macbooks?![]()
Wirelessly posted via wap.offtopic.com (htc touch : Opera/9.50 (J2ME/MIDP; Opera Mini/4.1.11355/408; U; en))
Is that one of the new macbooks?![]()
IBM >* and you know this![]()
Wirelessly posted via wap.offtopic.com (htc touch : Opera/9.50 (J2ME/MIDP; Opera Mini/4.1.11355/408; U; en))
Is that one of the new macbooks?![]()
they're not the same shot.
The 5D shot has an extra stop. Of course it's going to look better, it's properly exposed....
![]()
Wirelessly posted via wap.offtopic.com (htc touch : Opera/9.50 (J2ME/MIDP; Opera Mini/4.1.11355/408; U; en))
Is that one of the new macbooks?![]()
I mean high iso = noise, and underexposed images = noise. so you're effectively doubling the noise the xti produces
XTI sucks ass at ISO 1600. I shoot alot in low lighting and high ISO.. It's the main reason why I upgraded to 5D.
There was barely any light in this shot:
kit lens 55mm f/5.6 1/2sec
http://uploader.ws/upload/200805/xti.jpg[IMG][/QUOTE]
kill yourself