beachbum
Well-Known Member
- Feb 5, 2005
- 3,193
"Our leaders (not me, of course!) are pathetic. They only know how to lose!"
The projection is amazing



Those guys think they're such big shit
This random dude maybe.Where is he getting this 200k more votes than voters crap from? Usually he has some tweet or newmax spitting information to him.
His lawyers must be horrible at their jobs if 200k people voted who shouldn't have.
Where is he getting this 200k more votes than voters crap from? Usually he has some tweet or newmax spitting information to him.
His lawyers must be horrible at their jobs if 200k people voted who shouldn't have.
Where is he getting this 200k more votes than voters crap from? Usually he has some tweet or newmax spitting information to him.
His lawyers must be horrible at their jobs if 200k people voted who shouldn't have.
His ex wife and former gf both have restraining orders against him. He is an admitted alcoholic. The perfect guy to find such a startling smoking gun lol.
the numbers are bullshit.I don't really know what it means though.
"Department of State shows that 6,962,607 total ballots were reported as being cast, while DoS/SURE system records indicate that only 6,760,230 total voters actually voted."
How do they track voters who voted? As compared to ballots?
It's not registered voters. They're saying people who voted is less than ballots they got. But i don't know where that figure comes from. How do they count voters who voted if not by ballots cast? I know they can count the books when people sign in to get their ballot, but what about mail in, he it military or absentee or just covid mail voting.the numbers are bullshit.
pa all parties registered voter totals : 8,599,294 [https://www.dos.pa.gov/VotingElecti...cs/Documents/2020 Primary VR Stats FINAL.pdf]
pa presidential results: (6,915,283 voted) [https://www.electionreturns.pa.gov/]
View attachment 90980
Lol so they did this analyze before Philly even finished putting their data in. And wonder why they're short.![]()
PA Republican lawmakers: Analysis finds presidential election numbers don't add up
A group of Republican lawmakers say they’ve performed an extensive analysis of election day data and they’ve found “troubling” discrepancies. According to State Rep. Frank Ryan (R-Lebanon), 17 lawmakers sponsored and participated in the analysis.wjactv.com
The Pennsylvania Department of State released the following statement in response to the Republicans' claims:
"In today’s release Rep. Ryan and others rehash, with the same lack of evidence and the same absence of supporting documentation, repeatedly debunked conspiracy theories regarding the November 3 election. State and federal judges have sifted through hundreds of pages of unsubstantiated and false allegations and found no evidence of fraud or illegal voting.
"Now, the legislators have given us another perfect example of the dangers of uninformed, lay analysis combined with a basic lack of election administration knowledge.
"For instance, it is quite common to have significant "undervotes" for down-ballot races in a presidential election, particularly when there isn't a U.S. Senate race on the ballot. In 2000, Sen. Santorum received 200,000 more votes than President Bush, but the US Senate race still had more than 100,000 fewer votes than the presidential race.
"We are unclear as to what data the legislators used for this most recent “analysis.” But the only way to determine the number of voters who voted in November from the SURE system is through the vote histories. At this time, there are still a few counties that have not completed uploading their vote histories to the SURE system. These counties, which include Philadelphia, Allegheny, Butler and Cambria, would account for a significant number of voters. The numbers certified by the counties, not the uploading of voter histories into the SURE system, determines the ultimate certification of an election by the secretary.
"This obvious misinformation put forth by Rep. Ryan and others is the hallmark of so many of the claims made about this year’s presidential election. When exposed to even the simplest examination, courts at every level have found these and similar conspiratorial claims to be wholly without basis.
"To put it simply, this so-called analysis was based on incomplete data."
Times of legitimate national existential struggle are definitely great times for gifting.
If you needed any further proof these fucking parasites don't believe a word they say.
we'll outsmart the computers with stupid shit
By voter check in.It's not registered voters. They're saying people who voted is less than ballots they got. But i don't know where that figure comes from. How do they count voters who voted if not by ballots cast? I know they can count the books when people sign in to get their ballot, but what about mail in, he it military or absentee or just covid mail voting.
By voter check in.
Ballots can be blank or never turned in or otherwise rejected
This is the biggest political news since Killary was chunked like beef