Discussion in 'On Topic' started by minus, Jun 24, 2007.
Damn hippies. Yeah, cause people who get their prints on file with the FBI are going to go out and commit crimes. Wouldn't this possibly open the door to harassment?
someone should post the address of BILL CUMMINGS
What the hell is wrong with these newspapers? I thought news agencies were supposed to be neutral, not have an apparent agenda.
Bill Cummings isnt the problem its Marian Gail Brown (also with the Comm Post ([email protected] (203) 330-6288)) who wouldnt accept the offer of all the apps with the names, addresses and DOBs redacted. What possible purpose could that info serve?
All the local CHL holders should push to have all spare tire, and fire extinguisher owners added to the list.
This is a fairly recent idea, and not one that I'm fond of. All news agencies are biased, why not be open and honest about it. back in the day we were and papers were even named accordingly like the city democrat, or town republican.
Where is that laid out?
I'm not familiar with their state law but this sounds like a job for the court system. It sounds like someone is trying to make a run around the law.
No, it's not.
I'm not even certain I'd consider that a bonus. It'd probably require a whole extra "oversight committee" which would require higher taxes, broad regulatory privelages, extra bureaucracy, etc etc.
where's that in the US Constitution, I seem to have missed that article/amendment.
I know that some state constitutions outline a right to privacy, I'm not sure how many but amazingly CA is one of them. A few states just copied the fourth amendment and added something about "invasion of privacy" as an addendum to the unreasonable search and seizure bit.