Discussion in 'Lifestyle' started by coughlin's law, Oct 20, 2007.
And price it around $350 ... you know how many that would sell?
I thought you didn't see the point of wide angle lenses?
I am slowly, my 17-55 sucks...
18-55 or 17-55? 'Cos I thought the 17-55 was an alright lens. I take it you're using a crop body. 17mm is awesome at full frame.
Having said that, someone buy me the 14mm 2.8 Nikkor. kthx.
Digital Rebel XT... I don't mind
Its possible to make, but it would be huge and very very expensive. It would have to have alot of glass....
And why can't they make a 100-800 f/1.2 and price it at $99. Do you know how many they would sell?
Why are there no 10-22mm's with 1.8 or 2.8 openings?
cause even at f/4-5.6 its already 600 dollars. no one would fucking spend 1500 dollars on a wide angle lens like that...plus the weight would be insane
The new Nikkor 14-24 is f2.8.
canon and tamron 14mm 2.8
i'm not sure how often you'd actually be able to shoot wide open though, seems the situations are pretty much limited
I dont really see how it would be of any advantage. Ive never tried to shoot something moving fast with my 10-20. DOF is almost infinite and I dont think it being 1.8 would make much difference to that.